BricMor - Hyderabad Image

Bricmor Westpines Villas
Review On BricMor, Hyderabad

1% 1 10 Votes Claim this business
OTP Verification

Enter 4-digit code
Bricmor Westpines Villas
Sep 06, 2023 10:45 AM 902 views
(Updated May 13, 2024 03:52 PM)

Customer Service:

Staff Courtesy:

Product Implementation Rate:

Bricmor Westpines Villas Applied for permission in 2013 and got permission from HMDA in 2014(Housing Plan not under Gated Community Layout), till now the project has been going on with lot of issues.


Caution to all Buyers:

  1. No 40ft approach road to Westpine Villas, don’t know how Builder got permission from HMDA in 2014

  2. No Occupancy Certificate from HMDA till now, but people staying in villas by not paying any property tax to the government.

  3. No doubt I appreciate the builder on the construction of Internal Roads, but no maintenance water lagging in most of the places on normal rain.

  4. No Amenities as per the Westpines Boucher Commitments.

  5. Permission from HMDA, Housing Plan not under Gated Community Layout

  6. No Bank loans for construction of project only depends on private funding check EC copy from 2014 you will know the history of the project

  7. Issues with Landowners and villa owners some encroachment(complaints with HMDA and other competent authorities)

  8. No proper security/No CCTV cameras

Check the following documents before purchasing the villa in Westpines or any Bricmor Projects

  1. Profile/History of Builder.

  2. Take the EC copy of the Project site and check thoroughly if there is any GPA, if GPA exists it is considered to be a second sale and there is no GST on a second sale.

  3. Take the Boucher from the builder, and thoroughly check if this is a gated community or non-gated community villa, check the HMDA Permission Letter, and also check the amenities provided by the builder as per Boucher's commitment.

  4. Take a Legal Opinion from the Lawyer before purchasing the villa.


Please rate this review usefulnessRating Breakup

Very Useful (39%)

Useful (61%)

Not Useful (0%)

Comment on this review